Puzzles

by Dick Nuenke

 

 


 

 
Check out  Quest   for more brain exercising.

 

 


 

 
The first February cryptogram was: 
WHEN  PASSENGER  OF  FOOT  HEAVE  IN  SIGHT,  TOOTLE  THE  HORN.  TRUMPET  HIM  MELODIOUSLY  AT  FIRST,  BUT  IF  HE  STILL  OBSTACLES  YOUR  PASSAGE,  THEN  TOOTLE  HIM  WITH  VIGOR. 

And the second cryptogram was

GAMBLING  IS  A  DISEASE  OF  BARBARIANS  SUPERFICIALLY  CIVILIZED.  —  DEAN  INGE.

(William R. Inge (1860-1954), Dean of St. Paul's, not the novelist and playwright William M. Inge.)

Correct answers to both came from  Delmar BurkittAndrzej DerdzinskiElizabeth FooteJeff LambAlma LittenJulia MinturnCarla NuenkeKevin SkehanBill Tippery  and  Sally YocomJohn Jackson  and  Carole Perlman  also did the first cryptogram.

The third puzzle had problems, aside from that of the circles not printing as a result of electronic transfer.  There are virtually an infinite number of answers, and numerous trivial ones.  Elizabeth Foote noted that any single number used four times will work.  The original example showed four different numbers, but unfortunately the directions didn't specify that.  One answer (of many possible), given in the New Scientist, was 13, 25, 41, and 35.  I accepted the answers from  AndrzejElizabethJeff,  and  Bob Walton.  Bob is apparently a member of another group.


 

 


 

 
This is the first of two cryptograms.  Each letter stands for a different letter in the decoded message.
 
 
V H M S        X S        F        N H U        O F V X S,        F K V M H R W        V X W M O W        E W A X W E        F N U W M ' R        N F I        F S E        E X E        S H J        V W O H K W        D M W R X E W S J.       

— O N X A J H S       A F E X K F S

 

 


 

 
The second cryptogram is what I'd call an "alternative definition".  (Think B.C.)
 
 
U N Y P O Y N U V N :        J K X N U M L O U I N I P R        J U X S N B O U Y        M G N        I A A B O U        R A C B        U O Y G M O N.       

 

 


 

 
This puzzle is by Richard England from the column Enigma in the New Scientist by permission.

Andre and Boris played a tennis match in which the winner was the first player to win three sets.  A set is won by the first player to win 6 games, except that if it goes to 5 games all, it will be won either 7 games to 5 or 7 games to 6.

In the match Andre won the 1st, 4th, 8th, 9th and 16th games and all the others whose numbers were perfect squares or cubes.  Boris won the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 11th games and all the others whose numbers were primes.  When the match was over it was noted that each player had won exactly the same number of games, that number being the smallest compatible with the other information given.

In giving the score of a tennis match it is the convention to give the score in each set in order, always giving the match-winner's score first, so that if the score is given as, for example, 7-6, 4-6, 6-2, 6-0, it shows that the one set that the match-winner lost was the second set, won by the opponent 6 games to 4.  Using this convention tell me who won the match, and what were the set scores?


 

 


 

 
Correct answers and puzzle solvers will appear next month.  Send answers by  March 14th  to Dick Nuenke;  1460 Kingsgate Rd.;  Columbus, OH 43221 or call in (recording 24 hours) to 614-326-0452;  fax to 614-292-4118;  or e-mail to rnuenke@columbus.rr.com.

 

 


 

 

 
 

people | news | calendar | gifted children
diversions | area | home page